Google




What About Bob? Email Print

Remember Bob?

Sure you do, ya know, Baghdad Bob?  

The one who entertained us on a daily basis back when things were almost good and we'd just embarked on our grand adventure.

"We have them surrounded in their tanks"

-- Iraqi Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

Yeah! That Bob.

Personally I didn't put any stock in what ol' Bob was saying. He could have said that the earth was round and I would've come up with some reason to doubt his assertion.  The press especially had fun at ol' Bob's expense. Every night it seemed that Bob was getting mocked and ridiculed by the US press.
"The American press is all about lies! All they tell is lies, lies and more lies!"

"Lying is forbidden in Iraq. President Saddam Hussein will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts."

-- Iraqi Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

Yeah - That Bob.
"I have detailed information about the situation...which completely proves that what they allege are illusions . . . They lie every day."

-- Iraqi Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

Going back over this, it still cracks me up. How could someone, anyone, so blatantly lie to a world that has eyes and ears? I'm still wondering if anyone, even one person ever believed anything the man said.
The cause of Iraqi democracy is worth it.

-- Tony Snow

I wonder if Joseph Goebbels was met with the same scorn and derision as poor Bob. I mean, Goebbels was supposedly the master spinmeister, THE propagandist. Were his statements as loony on their face as ol' Bob's?
It strikes me that that's a highly slanted way to present what's going on -- number one, that he's more a liability than an asset. No. The President does not regard him as a liability. What does happen is that in the political class, what's happening? They're trying to -- they're going after Alberto Gonzales. Have they found anything? No. What, in fact, has gone on is that the Attorney General and the Justice Department have made extraordinary gestures toward precisely the transparency you asked -- all the emails have been made public. You get to see the emails, they get to see the emails. They have offered to make available for questioning anybody who wants to be there. They are under an obligation to tell the truth.

-- Tony Snow

Maybe someday I'll look into that - the BS spewed by the Third Reich just before they began their march across Europe.
No, what I'm saying is in September you'll have an opportunity to have metrics. I think what we have been saying is you'll have an opportunity at that juncture to be able to do a sensible analysis of what happens when you've got all the forces in place for the Baghdad security plan.

-- Tony Snow

Somehow I miss ol' Bob. I mean, looking back it seemed a much more innocent time. A time when an information minister so obviously lying, was entertainment.
Are you saying that detaining people who are plucked off the battlefields is an assault on democracy? Are you kidding me? You're talking about the people who were responsible for supporting the Taliban, somehow detaining them is an assault on democracy?
[...]
No, many have been held, but many also are now being processed through the system. What I just thought was peculiar is that you have people who waged active warfare against democracy and you think detaining them somehow is an assault on democracy.
-- Tony Snow
Yeah. Not so long ago everything was different.
No one can now doubt the word of America.

--George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 20, 2004.

Not so very long ago.
"These cowards have no morals. They have no shame about lying"

-- Iraqi Information Minister Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

He did get one thing right it seems.

by daMule on 06/14/2007 05:28:18 PM EST

...poking about.  Somewhere recently I came across a statement by Harper that American, British and Canadian intelligence agencies all felt that Saddam had WMD or programs to produce them.  I don't recall where I read it, doesn't matter.  Hindsight is 20-20 and we know that the capability was not in Iraq at the time of the invasion.  People who were not deluding themselves knew at the time of the invasion that there wasn't much, if any, threat from Iraq.

I didn't find a confirmation of CSIS ( Canadian Security Intelligence Service ) stating Saddam had WMD.  If Harper said Iraq did he was likely ignoring the caveats that CSIS, along with all other intelligence agencies included with their assessments.

So, what's your point, willy ?

Oh, I don't have one - just ramblin'.  I did come across this in my poking about.

Intelligence is a tool, not a crutch for decision makers. Moreover, in this case, so what if the agencies and the decision makers were wrong? Saddam Hussein was still toppled, and this was all to the good anyway. His regime certainly won't have WMD now, will they? Problem solved, end of story.

It is from by John Thompson ( President of the Mackenzie Institute ) - 02/16/04

Now there is a voice of reason, eh ! <snark>

------------------------------------

Here are a couple of, abet dated, pieces from Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies (CISS)

Missing in Action: Weapons of Mass Destruction (July, 2003)

Lies, Damn Lies, and Intelligence (February, 2004)

Both by David Rudd

Almost all Western intelligence agencies concurred with a reports of suspicious activity in the weeks and months leading up to the war. While vehemently chastising the US for its haste in acting on incomplete information, former UN weapons inspection chief Hans Blix acknowledged that Iraq acted as if it had much to hide.
[...]
If he ( Saddam ) was successful in drawing an impatient America into an unnecessary war, and making his country suffer mightily for it, it will surely rank as one of the great tragedies of our time.

Rudd seems a bit of an apologist for Bush / Blair.  He does come around in his later article.

Did Bush and Saddam mislead each other and simultaneously mislead themselves? [snip]  Does it even matter, now that Saddam's butchery has ended and Iraq is lurching toward democracy?

Yes, it does. The war was conceived as a counter-measure to an allegedly thriving exotic weapons program. Among the results is the biggest intelligence failure since Pearl Harbour. [snip]

Saddam was held to account for his misdeeds and obfuscations. There must now be some sort of reckoning for the Bush and Blair governments.

The Canadian Institute of Strategic Studies (CISS) has these people as some of it's directors.           

  • Senator Hugh Segal (Chairman)

  • LGen (Retd) Donald C. Mackenzie ( He appears to have no connection to the Mackenzie Institute )

  • MGen (Retd) D. Fraser Holman

  • BGen (Retd) W. Donald Macnamara

I make no allegations that any of these people know what they are talking about.  I will allege that Harper doesn't know what he is doing.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/15/2007 11:55:18 PM EST

That though a mistake may have been made, it's all good in the end because Hussein is gone, I want to scream AT WHAT COST!!!!!

Do they actually believe that old saying if you have to ask you can't afford it?

The hubris expressed by all these men just floors me.  The cost in men, materiel, and in innocent human life is absolutely astronomical, to say nothing about the shift in the political winds around the world.

I am simply appalled when anyone says yeah, well, he was a bad man.  God damn it! He was their bad man.  Until he wasn't.

Freedom without responsibility is license and not liberty. Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Bionic on 06/16/2007 05:41:47 PM EST

[ Parent ]
for that sort of hubris, and lack of empathy. Obviously none of these assholes or their family members have their 'boots on the ground'.

Yes, I'm sure Iraqis of all denominations feels it's been worth it. Electricity for a couple hours a day, if you're lucky. The dead, the displaced.

But everything's just tickety-boo over there right now, isn't it? Just tickety-boo.

When will the media report on all the good stuff that's happening over there? </snark>.

It's truly criminal.

The Grasshopper Lies Heavy

by Frank Frink on 06/16/2007 07:32:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Should have linked to the other mosque bombing (in addition to the one in Samarra on Wednesday) - this one in Basra.

Link to WaPo story instead.

The Grasshopper Lies Heavy

by Frank Frink on 06/17/2007 01:11:30 AM EST

[ Parent ]
...set of articles, ff.

I think there is a civil war over there and the U.S. is throwing away the life's of it's troops and killing a number of Iraqis in the bargain.

How's this for an assessment:

The Bush administration, meanwhile, continues to pressure al-Maliki to move faster with the legislation it says are needed to build reconciliation and reduce the violence.

Bombs are going off and the answer is to pass laws.  What a concept.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/17/2007 01:11:40 AM EST

[ Parent ]
...distilled a piece of truth there.  It rates a five, IMO.

....yeah, well, he was a bad man.  God damn it! He was their bad man.  Until he wasn't.

It's a dangerous, stupid, short-sighted game to support a dictator, even when if you don't support him your enemies will.  Things, and dictators, come back to bite you in the ass.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/16/2007 06:50:09 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Come across them before and this part bothers me (emphasis mine).

Please note that (for obvious reasons) the Institute reveals neither its funding sources, nor the identity of its board.

Obvious to whom? And why?

(It's named for the explorer Alexander Mackenzie

The Grasshopper Lies Heavy

by Frank Frink on 06/16/2007 01:30:30 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The not revealing of funding sources does raise a red flag.  One possible explanation is that by keeping the funding concealed they can't be accused of bias in their research.  If we don't know who funds them, we don't know what their funders would like them to say, therefore what they say is objective and bias free.  I'm not buying that one.

You are right, the cherry on top of the sundae is - for obvious reasons

I like the disclosure of the CISS better.  I still don't know who is ponying up the bulk of the funding, but I do know what field ( left, right center ) the Institute is coming out of.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/16/2007 01:49:07 PM EST

[ Parent ]
Probably for no longer than a couple of minutes.
Ve haff vays...

Propaganda - a 1928 book by Edward Bernays. He used the term up until the time that Goebbels adopted it.

In his autobiography, titled Biography of an Idea, Bernays recalls a dinner at his home in 1933 where

Karl von Weigand, foreign correspondent of the Hearst newspapers, an old hand at interpreting Europe and just returned from Germany, was telling us about Goebbels and his propaganda plans to consolidate Nazi power. Goebbels had shown Weigand his propaganda library, the best Weigand had ever seen. Goebbels, said Weigand, was using my book Crystallizing Public Opinion as a basis for his destructive campaign against the Jews of Germany. This shocked me. ... Obviously the attack on the Jews of Germany was no emotional outburst of the Nazis, but a deliberate, planned campaign.

Bernays ('the Father of Spin'), Ivy Lee ('the physician to corporate bodies;), and Harold Laswell. The Tony Show has quite a heritage.

Yeah, I miss Baghdad Bob too. He would be great on those infomercial shows. Does Ron Popeil need a sidekick?

The Grasshopper Lies Heavy

by Frank Frink on 06/14/2007 06:34:28 PM EST

Take it all back.

Ron Popeil has only goodness in his heart. Think of the happiness he has spread, his public service and concern for humanity.

Consider the smokeless ashtray. That's not the work of an evil person. Think of all the labour saved with the veg-o-matic. You've probably been slicing and dicing on your own. Get into the 21st century man!

But for the envy he'd be awarded the Nobel Prize. Who else has developed such an effective treatment for male pattern baldness: Hair in a Can Spray

Product Info:
Good Looking Hair is a unique hair spray paint that instantly covers thinning hair and baldness. This spray on hair is made up of tiny fibers that accurately mimic real hair follicles. Good Looking Hair is ideal for covering up light to moderate balding, thinning, or shedding. Simply spray Good Looking Hair onto the scalp for a thicker, fuller head of hair, instantly!

Testimonials:
"I received the product and am very pleased. GLH is one of the best. I am ordering more as nobody can tell I wear it" CK, Cyprus.

And I shouldn't have to mention the millions of smiles provided by the best fishing invention of the century: Ronco's Pocket Fisherman (commercial)

by paul2port on 06/14/2007 08:55:14 PM EST

[ Parent ]
What about the Patty Stacker?

"...but wait, there's more!"

Mr. Microphone?

Spray-on hair. Ya' gotta love it.

Is there still that much of a market for this?

The Grasshopper Lies Heavy

by Frank Frink on 06/14/2007 09:32:46 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I'd forgotten about the record vacuum. A DJ friend still has about 17,000 albums. I'll start looking for his birthday present now.

If I order today as a special bonus I'll receive ginsu knives...

by paul2port on 06/14/2007 09:46:51 PM EST

[ Parent ]
.... sure it does things fast.  But washing it is a tedious chore, IMHO.

Net gain - nothing, unless you are making coleslaw for 30.

Folks, I will let you in on the ground floor on a great idea of mine.  Just pony up $999.99 in developement money and get a piece of -

Hair Spray in a can formulated with SillyString. For that full, luxurious look.

Visa, MasterCard and PayPal accepted.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/14/2007 10:32:52 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I do remember Baghdad Bob.  The Snow Job is such an apt name for the continuing performances of Tony Snow.  There is a front page diary on dKos now by Kagro X.

Q: Are there any members of the Bush family or this administration in this war?

SNOW: Yeah, the President. The President is in the war every day.

Talk about spin.

Here's a golden oldie - Conserve Water / Shower with a friend

by willy be frantic on 06/14/2007 10:40:38 PM EST

But on the frontlines everyday.

Where is the outrage?  Even if Bush was actually a good C in C, and actually contributing to the running of this war, he is hardly on the frontlines, when there are actually people on the frontlines getting maimed and dying there.

Did you see The Daily Show?

"We never said that."  Roll tape showing them saying exactly that.

It doens't matter what he was actually talking about.  They do it over and over again.

Freedom without responsibility is license and not liberty. Ralph Waldo Emerson

by Bionic on 06/15/2007 04:46:29 PM EST

[ Parent ]
I just play one in the blogs, but Helen Thomas asked Tony Snow if any of the Bush family were serving in Iraq and ...

It seems to suggest this administration has some psychopathology.

by paul2port on 06/15/2007 05:31:41 PM EST

[ Parent ]
The 1% don't dirty their hands with war, silly!  They don't even do their own laundry.  War, like laundry and dishes, are for The Help.

For those of you who haven't figured it out yet, anyone who isn't in the 1% is The Help.  That includes average millionaires, too.  If you have a 5,000 sq. ft. McMansion and a brand new Hummer?  Yep, still The Help according to the Bushies.  You, me, and anyone who isn't in the old money horsey set is The Help.  If you think they respect you because you're a card-carrying Republican or Conservative voter, guess again.  They think you're a chump and a fool.  

Canadian Republicans Suck

by prole on 06/15/2007 06:06:56 PM EST

[ Parent ]
they got "intelligence" from a guy they codenamed Curveball. Everything they touch is fucking rotten to the core.  Everything.  

Canadian Republicans Suck

by prole on 06/15/2007 10:32:00 AM EST